![]() |
| Nicolas Cage on a Rolling Stone magazine cover Source: Google |
2. How are you affected by the images you see?
3. What can be done to reduce the amount of young men and women that are negatively affected by these images?
Magazines and ads could reduce their use of photo editors and show viewers and readers realistic, genuine people. They could prove that natural can be just as or even a multititude of times more attractive than an overly photo-shopped face and body.
4. What would your reaction be to a magazine cover where the subject isn’t all glammed up? Is this a possible route that society should take? Why or why not?
My initial reaction would probably be slight shock since such a thing is rare to stumble upon. I'd then be very pleased by the magazine for showing the subject in a more natural state! I love it when people are more genuine and true to themselves rather than trying to appear as something they are worlds from. I really do think think it's a route the society should take. These magazine covers can really influence people... and by going the 'natural' way, perhaps it will effect people in more positive ways. The unrealistic 'beauty' that magazine covers bear make others feel more uncomfortable with who they are as a natural being. A less glammed up person would definitely show others that you are beautiful without any type of computerized alterations!
